| Scientific Studies vs. Real Life Experiences |
|
|
|
|
Scientific Studies vs. Real Life Experiences: Why I Recommend The Doctors I Do What some people fail to consider is that there is a very large amount of offline activity. First and foremost, because SH is such a relentlessly upbeat forum, people with problems often feel like they can't post when their resurfacings have gone bad. It's a very small number that come back to tell about their pain or their revisions. But they are out there. Both Alan and I help a lot of people offline. We have access to a lot of stories that most people never hear about, and we remain ethical enough not to post details about other people's problems or about the doctors involved. The world is not as black-and-white as some would like to believe it as. One doesn't need a statistically-backed study published in a peer-reviewed journal to know when something is wrong with a particular doctor or approach. I keep track of a lot of data, not only posts, but private emails and phone calls as well. Currently I speak to at least one patient a day on the phone and sometimes up to 6 patients a day. To give an example, I spoke to and worked with 4 patients and know of 2 others of one particular surgeon who will remain unnamed. The outcomes have been far from positive, several needing revision surgeries to THR’s and a couple ready to have theirs revised. You will never see me recommending this surgeon. Have these patients posted on SH? Yes, prior to their surgeries and prior to their problems. Does anyone on SH know about these problems? Certainly not, as evidenced by reading the board. Has this doctor had some positive outcomes? Sure, but considering this particular surgeon has not done that many resurfacings, this is NOT a surgeon I will ever recommend. Is that data published anywhere? Absolutely not. Will there be a patient that posts on SH about having a good outcome? Absolutely, but you tell me, if you were sitting in my shoes, would you look at 6 failures that you personally know of in less than 100 procedures and not do something to give this information to a future patient about this doctor? On the other side of the coin, I have met many doctors in person and I can see and hear the difference between those that have passion in their voice about hip resurfacings and can tell that they genuinely care about the outcome of their patients and advancing their knowledge and skills to better serve their patients versus those that I can genuinely tell they only care about the outcome of their practices. I gather a ton of data in many ways, from patients, reading stories from patients, from the doctors themselves, etc. Out of all of this gathered information over the past three plus years, I have come to my own conclusions. Those conclusions are constantly evolving with the more I learn. Are they right or wrong? No, they are just my own opinions based on education and experience, and some of it is based on gut instincts as well. I am a patient advocate. I try to stay as neutral as possible, but I always look out for the patient’s best interest first, not the doctor’s best interest or any manufacturers, but the patient’s best interests. I recommend certain doctors because I see their outcomes and talk to their patients. I don’t recommend certain doctors because I see their outcomes and talk to their patients. Is this a scientific study? Absolutely not. But if you only believe in scientific studies and discard the real life experiences of people that have become your friends as fellow surface hippies, then what is the point? Which would you tend to believe? A fellow surface hippy calling in tears (happy or sad) or a scientific paper or study? |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|





